About Me

My photo
I'm a late bloomer...going back to school after my children are grown. I have 1 precious grandson and 3 children. I teach Homebound Students (too sick to attend school, but can work at their own pace). I hope to earn my Master's Degree in Educational Technology Leadership in order to move to the college level at some point.

Sunday, February 27, 2011

EDLD 5364 Constructivism, Connectivism, and Cyborg Learning

There were basically three learning concepts that were examined this week.  They included constructivism, connectivism and cyborg learning. Constructivism involves learning centered environments and student led activities and makes the students responsible for their own learning and connecting the new learning to prior learning.  Connectivism extends that student centered learning environment to include the group collaboration, sharing and critique to the product that demonstrates student learning.  Cyborg learning involves the stimulation of the brain through computer chips embedded into the human, along with stimulation of the brain and other nerves through electronic pulses. 
Whereas constructivism and connectivism seem very practical learning theories, the cyborg learning theory is very futuristic and very controversial.  I have used both constructivism and connectivism in my classroom with varied success rates, depending mostly on my ability to facilitate.  I cannot see myself allowing computer chips to be embedded in myself or my own family members.  Perhaps I am yet to immigarate to the Cyborg world.
Siemens, G. (nd). The Changing Nature of Knowledge. Youtube.com. Retrieved on Oct. 5, 2009 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v-YMcTHndpzYg
Soloman, G., & Schrum, L. (2007). Web 2.0: New tools, New Schools. Eugene, OR:International Society for Technology in Education, 7-44.
Warwirk, K. (nd). Cyborg Life. Youtube.com. Retrieved on Oct. 5, 2009 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RB_I7SY_ngI

Friday, February 4, 2011

EDLD 5301 Action Plan

Action Planning Template
Goal:  How can I utilize the sources of technology free, or already available through the district, that could also be used for homebound students? 

The purpose of this research project is to discover sources of current technology, free or now available in the district, and use them to interact with homebound students.

Action Steps
Person(s) Responsible
Timeline: Start/End
Needed Sources
Evaluation
1.  Create, distribute and evaluate 2 surveys to parents/students and teachers of homebound students
Pam Mahalec
February1/
February 15, 2011
Online Survey, Written Survey
Evaluate results
2.  Interview Assistive Technology Facilitator and Special Educational Technology Coordinator
Pam Mahalec
February 1/February 15, 2011
Interview materials
List of available technology to be created
3.  Based on survey and interview results, create a list of technology to be used for each of 8 students
Pam Mahalec, with the support of Asst. Tech. Facilitator and Spec. Ed. Tech. Coordinator
February 15/February 28, 2011
Survey and Interview results, list of technology available
Evaluate each situation based on previous field notes (Pam Mahalec)
4.  Get permission from parents to video/photograph students
Pam Mahalec, along with Team Leader
February 15/February 28, 2011
Permission forms
Completed permission forms collected
5.  Begin utilizing technology with students
Pam Mahalec
March 1/May 15, 2011
Technology, Field notes, Video, Photos
Information to be evaluated
6.  Collect research data from previous studies
Pam Mahalec
Ongoing throughout Study
Notes, citations of sources
Information to be compiled and organized
7.  Create,  distribute and evaluate post-study survey/evaluation forms from parents/students/teacher
Pam Mahalec
May 16/May 22, 2011
Survey/
Evaluation forms
Evaluate Results
8.  Publish research results
Pam Mahalec
June 3, 2011
Surveys, evaluations, field notes, video, photos
Share results with all parties involved through a written report